Not to be disarming, but I did not want to use "insurgency", because it would relate to belligerency, as I had begun to wiki. The field which I do not wish to alarm[!](pun on arm /disarm) is international relations in the age of transparency. (to be continued**) relative to scholasticism nor go mid-evil. Would that be olastic***? Think Snowden/Soros v. not* exactly^^ neo-con.
[Links (asterisks) bold added 2-11-14]
*I don't think this was on my radar (25:00)
(31: 32:00 "crisis of authority" Howard Dean folks, 37:00 cure "municipal libertarianism" "conventional Rawlsian liberalism"? 38:00 )
** I've lost the inspiration^ for this
^ a few links that triggered the concept
^^ sort of the ticket
The sequence of inserts
not*, Twilight of the Elites
nor Philosophy 101
that General Theory of Reflexivity
... A.Primary
Boogeyman, B., C.AM
Calm PACtification,
***last inserts (~48:~55? Left Burkian? )
Showing posts with label Soros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Soros. Show all posts
Saturday, February 08, 2014
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Technical Difficulties
Anomalies or Synchronicities? By definition they are hard to explain. But there was first the missing link that I referenced here and then the Eli Pariser "bubble" context. Then there is the Wrap(5***) problem* and follow up **.
* in context is biased
** also needs follow-up and labels
*** anomoly (2) / anomaly(1) (W itch Are)
[then there is the Al Gore Rhythm Spell Check problem, and follow ups.]
(note: numbers in (brackets) are links as found in search to check any change in the algorithms C-W r a p(5).)
Note: Psychology Label added, Physics and Philosophy already applied(6), not necessarily used well.
[By Jove I may have it.]
[Speaking of hunches Gingrich may be wit Mitt. He may be making Mitt and others look good, and working the churned media for his own Obamanation.]
Thursday, May 19th, 2011
Technical difficulties is no pun on Speaker Boehner calling the government broke or Ed Schultz calling it broken. Or was it? Given the anomalies and synchronicity theories who knows? But it was about looking at my own modus operandi and then blogspot having its difficulties and Eli Pariser's TED Talk on the Internet. The word follow-up(4) may have popped up and is applicable(2 to insert here).
Friday, May 20th, 2011
Speaking of difficulties, I had to correct yesterday being Friday. I guess I get a second shot. Note Psychology Label added for reasons then above and follow up, references "rational expectations" not to mention talk and guts. (Bush v. Lakoff) Speaking of talk, yesterday's inserts (2 became 3) are economic talks(YouTube) from INETeconomics.org. And a reminder that problem* above is a Koch Brothers spin. And note to self** is still pending* while I might return to Risk and Robustness.
Since it is Friday and I have several posts in draft that relate to this link, I might note that this is still under construction if I ever get back to it. But in this regard I will say that this is the first INET link I watched and have found several others I might recommend that have been imbedded above but will simple list here:
Keynes in a box? I will not expound upon this academic pun except to note the room and a flip-flop. i.e. what I took from Huntington and what Fukuyama may have learned or changed.
*scroll or click but nfry = not fully read yet
**Why I am not an Austrian Economist
*** see can(under bat)
[Not So Frackin' Funny: Demand a...side. (or Borg)Not Pop'nCulture]
* in context is biased
** also needs follow-up and labels
*** anomoly (2) / anomaly(1) (W itch Are)
[then there is the Al Gore Rhythm Spell Check problem, and follow ups.]
(note: numbers in (brackets) are links as found in search to check any change in the algorithms C-W r a p(5).)
Note: Psychology Label added, Physics and Philosophy already applied(6), not necessarily used well.
[By Jove I may have it.]
[Speaking of hunches Gingrich may be wit Mitt. He may be making Mitt and others look good, and working the churned media for his own Obamanation.]
Thursday, May 19th, 2011
Technical difficulties is no pun on Speaker Boehner calling the government broke or Ed Schultz calling it broken. Or was it? Given the anomalies and synchronicity theories who knows? But it was about looking at my own modus operandi and then blogspot having its difficulties and Eli Pariser's TED Talk on the Internet. The word follow-up(4) may have popped up and is applicable(2 to insert here).
Friday, May 20th, 2011
Speaking of difficulties, I had to correct yesterday being Friday. I guess I get a second shot. Note Psychology Label added for reasons then above and follow up, references "rational expectations" not to mention talk and guts. (Bush v. Lakoff) Speaking of talk, yesterday's inserts (2 became 3) are economic talks(YouTube) from INETeconomics.org. And a reminder that problem* above is a Koch Brothers spin. And note to self** is still pending* while I might return to Risk and Robustness.
Since it is Friday and I have several posts in draft that relate to this link, I might note that this is still under construction if I ever get back to it. But in this regard I will say that this is the first INET link I watched and have found several others I might recommend that have been imbedded above but will simple list here:
Raghuram Rajan: Delineating the Role of Government
Also see prior ** not fully read yet but gives context right off the bat***
Lance Taylor: Maynard's Revenge
Reforming the Macroeconomic Framework: Sushil Wadhwani
IMF Calls for New Economic Thinking: Or Does It?
Keynes in a box? I will not expound upon this academic pun except to note the room and a flip-flop. i.e. what I took from Huntington and what Fukuyama may have learned or changed.
*scroll or click but nfry = not fully read yet
**Why I am not an Austrian Economist
*** see can(under bat)
[Not So Frackin' Funny: Demand a...side. (or Borg)Not Pop'nCulture]
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Slash Segue
Michael Sandel: The lost art of democratic debate
And Criss-Classification
It is not about right or left but who* is the behind.
*please excuse the just(juxt)aposition of humor
---
For Sagans Sake: I will ungoogle the B. or link con tent:
(i.e. list of links above)
TED: Sandel as noted
Sandel/Soros
BookTV: Hedges on Class
New Yorker: Taleb
Jim Wallis(Sojourners) Sandel
BBC:Sit com? (no pun but Latin roots**)
Taleb Context
*
Asimov context
Mike Wallace: Ayn Rand
Embed(un) Pop Culture
Pre-Decartes or Aristotellian***?
**actual roots are(not) the spin on "darkest before the storm"
*** not to mention the B&A tangents not relinkeds(sp!)
[2-17-11 UPDATE:(not) Talk about a fifth sense? Yikes.]
And Criss-Classification
It is not about right or left but who* is the behind.
*please excuse the just(juxt)aposition of humor
---
For Sagans Sake: I will ungoogle the B. or link con tent:
(i.e. list of links above)
TED: Sandel as noted
Sandel/Soros
BookTV: Hedges on Class
New Yorker: Taleb
Jim Wallis(Sojourners) Sandel
BBC:Sit com? (no pun but Latin roots**)
Taleb Context
*
Asimov context
Mike Wallace: Ayn Rand
Embed(un) Pop Culture
Pre-Decartes or Aristotellian***?
**actual roots are(not) the spin on "darkest before the storm"
*** not to mention the B&A tangents not relinkeds(sp!)
[2-17-11 UPDATE:(not) Talk about a fifth sense? Yikes.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)